There is nothing controversial with the strong linkage between economic growth and the consumption of fossil fuels, at least for transports. I have earlier shown the high correlation between Swedish economic growth and the consumption of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel kerosene.
It is about time to do the same thing for the US.
The correlation between GDP and the sum of the consumption of fossil transport fuels is extremely high, 0.96. Like in Sweden, the correlation is even higher for diesel, 0.98, and lower for jet fuel kerosene.
A comparison between the two countries follows.
Correlation between GDP and all fossil transport fuel consumption
Correlation between GDP and diesel consumption
Correlation between GDP and gasoline consumption
Correlation between GDP and jet fuel kerosene consumption
For some reason the correlation between economic growth and jet fuel kerosene is higher in Sweden than the US.
Let me present a solution to the problem with an economy strongly dependent of transports fueled by fossil fuels as in both the US and in Sweden. Send the economy into a more or less permanent recession in order to keep pace with declining oil production in the aftermath of global peak oil.
Maybe not what unrealistic cornucopians would like to see as a solution?
Eternal growth is not possible in a finite world.